Ventilation Energy Simulator

Building Energy Spend Simulation

Compare Static vs Aerefy demand-controlled ventilation

Annual Summary

Static Energy

0.0 MWh

€0 / year

Aerefy Energy

0.0 MWh

€0 / year

Energy Saved

0.0 MWh

0.0% reduction

Cost Saved

€0

per year

CO₂ Saved

0 kg

0.0% reduction

Per Room/Day (Static)

€0.000

0.00 kWh

Per Room/Day (Aerefy)

€0.000

0.00 kWh

Aerefy Advantage

Save €0 annually

0%

Cost reduction

0 MWh

Energy saved

0 kg

CO₂ saved

33%

Airflow reduction

Monthly Analysis

Monthly Energy Consumption (kWh)

  • Static kWh
  • Aerefy kWh

Monthly Breakdown

MonthStatic kWhStatic €Aerefy kWhAerefy €Saved kWhSaved €
TOTAL (Annual)0€00€00€0

Annual Energy Distribution

Aerefy consumption

0.0 MWh

Energy saved

0.0 MWh

vs Static total:

0.0 MWh

Simulation Notes

This simulation covers ventilation energy only — not total building heating/cooling costs.

Aerefy reduces airflow proportionally to hotel occupancy × daily occupancy rate, cutting both AHU electricity and air conditioning energy.

Heat recuperation efficiency follows: η = -0.00204 × Q + 70

Day/night split is 12h each. Temperatures and prices can differ between periods.

⚠ Disclaimer

This simulation is based on simplified models and assumptions. While it aims to provide a useful approximation, it may not fully reflect real-world conditions or outcomes. Results should be interpreted with caution and verified against actual measurements or professional analysis where necessary.

Base:

Rooms: 148 · AHU: 10 kW · Airflow: 14400 m³/h

Building Energy Spend Simulation · Ventilation energy only · Static vs Aerefy demand-controlled ventilation